Compare NgRx, Akita, Elf, and Signals-based state management.
Skip to solutionKEEP THE
hardFrontend
What are the differences between State Management libraries in Angular?
41 views
01
Understand the problem
state-managementarchitecture
02
Attempt it yourself
Sketch your approach before reading the solution — that's what interviews test.
Nudge consolestandby
Stuck? Beam a request up — the console returns a conceptual nudge that guides your logic without spoiling the implementation.
03
Study the solution
NgRx provides heavy, Redux-pattern state management suited for massive enterprise apps. Akita and Elf use RxJS stores with simpler, object-oriented APIs. Signals-based state represents modern Angular: lightweight, low boilerplate, and reactive without needing RxJS.
Solution ready — 2 min read
Classified // press E to declassify
04
Read the code
A clean, modern state store using Signals
import { Injectable, signal, computed } from '@angular/core';
export interface Todo { id: number; text: string; done: boolean; }
@Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })
export class TodoStore {
private state = signal<{ todos: Todo[]; filter: string }>({
todos: [],
filter: 'all'
});
todos = computed(() => this.state().todos);
activeTodos = computed(() => this.state().todos.filter(t => !t.done));
addTodo(text: string) {
this.state.update(curr => ({
...curr,
todos: [...curr.todos, { id: Date.now(), text, done: false }]
}));
}
}05
Join the discussion
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion.
No responses yet. Be the first to share what you think.
Transmission complete // awaiting log
KEEP THE
STREAK ALIVE.
Dossier 121 of 121 decoded in the Angular track. One more won't hurt.