Boss mode

1,000 APPLIED.You read 40 of them and skipped number 612. Send every applicant a take-home or an AI interview instead: all 1,000 scored, ranked by 9am.

Nine hundred applications, opened in the order they landed, shortlist closed at forty. Send all nine hundred a take-home or an AI interview instead — our servers grade every attempt, anti-cheat rides along, and by morning the list is sorted by who can actually do the job.

2+

hiring workspaces

Replay

sessions on record

150+

challenges ready to assign

Capgemini · SakSoft · and more screen on evidence, not order

the problem you actually have

THE PILE ISN'T SORTED
BY TALENT.

You post one role and hundreds — sometimes thousands — of applications land in a week. Somebody opens them top-down, five minutes each, and runs out of attention around number forty. The shortlist closes there. The strongest engineer in that pile might be number 612, and nobody will ever find out, because the queue decided before the skill did.

900Applications for one opening
75 hrsTo read them all at 5 min each
~4%Of the pile a human ever opens

Read in arrival order

today

Attention runs out long before the pile does. Each square is an applicant.

#612 · never opened

■ read■ never opened■ your best hire

  • · Screening quality decays with every resume read
  • · Two recruiters rank the same pile differently
  • · Strong candidates go cold waiting for a reply
  • · The verdict rests on claims nobody verified

Ranked by what they built

here

Same pile, scored in parallel, best-first by morning.

#612 · now rank 1 · 92/100

■ interview these■ scored, kept warm■ surfaced at rank 1

  • · Every applicant gets the same assessment and rubric
  • · Grading runs on our servers while you sleep
  • · Integrity signals attached, so the top of the list is real
  • · You spend your hours on the twenty worth your hours

THREE THINGS DO THE SORTING.

None of them need your calendar, and each one runs across the whole list at once.

Take-home assignments

Everyone gets the same problem

One link goes to the whole applicant list. Real code, real execution, hidden tests — graded on our servers against your rubric, not skimmed by a tired human at 6pm.

AI interview

Round one runs without you

An AI screening interview talks to candidates in parallel, probes their answers with follow-ups, and returns a scored transcript. Hundreds of first rounds, none of them on your calendar.

Anti-cheat built in

So the ranking means something

Paste bursts, tab exits, timing anomalies and AI-likelihood are captured on every attempt and disclosed to the candidate. A score you can trust is the entire point of ranking.

the pipeline

ONE WORKSPACE,
EVERY STAGE.

From a thousand applicants down to the signed offer — no tool-hopping, no lost context between stages, and one record per candidate you can point at afterwards.

01

Create

Assessments in minutes, not sprints

  • Curated challenge library, ready to assign
  • Custom rubrics & structured scorecards
  • Author your own via MCP or the editor
02

Screen

The whole pile, scored in parallel

  • AI screening interviews, hundreds in parallel
  • Take-homes with server-side grading
  • Ranked shortlist, best-first, by morning
03

Interview

The live room, nothing to install

  • Multiplayer editor with live cursors
  • Real execution in 8 languages
  • Full session replay with integrity signals
04

Decide

Evidence, not vibes

  • Integrity report & AI-suspicion radar
  • Rubric scores side-by-side per candidate
  • Sync verdicts to Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby

live interview room

THE ROOM,
AS CANDIDATES SEE IT.

Collaborative editor, live execution and integrity signals — in the browser, with nothing to install on either side. Your team watches, replays and scores. This demo is live: it types below.

interviewpad.in/arena/java-collab-session
Solution.javaWebRTC Active
1import java.io.*;
2import java.util.*;
3 
4 Mia
5 Adam
6 
7 
8 
9 
Java 17 Sandboxed SDK2 Multiplayers Active
Proctor & Grader LogsWebRTC typing
AN

Jordan Avery

Senior Backend Candidate · Java

0
AI Score
--
--
Plagiarism
--
› Connected live WebRTC arena session
› Mia is editing Solution.java...
PROCTORING: ONGRADED BY GRADER-02
Live metric150Curated challenges ready to assign
Live metric8Execution languages, server-graded
Live metric3ATS integrations: Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby
Live cursorsSee who types what, and when
AI co-pilotSuggests follow-ups mid-session
Replay + signalsPaste, blur, keystroke timeline
AK · paste burst ×7
RS · clean run
JM · 4 tab exits
TP · AI-likelihood 12%
ND · steady focus

● clean● needs review— hover a blip

integrity radar

EVERY ATTEMPT
IS ON THE SCOPE.

Tab switches, clipboard events and timing anomalies — disclosed to the candidate, timestamped onto the replay, and presented for a human to read. The panel debates skill, never suspicion.

  • Paste burst ×7 in 40s — attempt flagged for review
  • RS · 38 min steady focus, zero exits — signal strong
  • 4 tab exits during hidden tests — timestamped
  • TP · AI-likelihood 12% — comfortably human

05 · why teams switch

SIX SURFACES,
ALL OF THEM LIVE.

Proctoring, challenge authoring, the multiplayer room, grading, rubrics and credits. Every demo below is running on this page — follow the flow.

Feature 1

Integrity signals & session replay

Tab switches, clipboard events and keystroke timing are recorded during an attempt — with the candidate told up front — and surfaced as a timeline your team reads. The system flags; a person decides.

  • Trust gauge that moves as signals arrive
  • Severity-tagged timeline, flagged inline
  • Full session reconstruction for post-review
Feature 2

Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Point the workspace at your own LLMs and grading pipelines over the open JSON-RPC standard, then discover, invoke and chain those tools like any built-in one.

  • Auto-discovery of available grading tools at runtime
  • Structured JSON responses with complexity and style analysis
  • Plug in any MCP-compatible model or evaluation server
Feature 3

Multiplayer interview room

Run the session together: live cursor tracking, in-editor chat, and peer-to-peer WebRTC keeping both sides in sync.

  • Multi-cursor editing with participant-colored indicators
  • Live typing awareness and in-editor chat
  • Peer-to-peer WebRTC for sub-50ms latency
Feature 4

Automated grading runtimes

Test matrices execute on submission, on our infrastructure. JUnit, Jest, PyTest and custom runners.

  • Visual pass/fail timeline with progress tracking
  • Performance and memory usage constraint checks
  • Security-focused test cases including injection guards
Feature 5

Structured rubrics & scorecards

Score every candidate against the same dimensions, so two interviewers reach comparable numbers — then export the whole scorecard as a PDF.

  • Scoring across quality, architecture and performance
  • Per-dimension breakdown, not a single blended number
  • One-click PDF export of the full scorecard
Feature 6

Credit-based billing

Screenings are billed as credits on top of seats, tracked live. Set seat bounds, cap workspace limits, and watch spend as it happens.

  • Live credit gauge with usage-per-assessment breakdown
  • Itemized recent usage history with cost tracking
  • Monthly spend analytics with trend visualization

◆ the argument, in one flip

RESUME vs REPLAY.

debounce-from-scratch · full session

24:16 · every keystroke kept

92/100

04:12 Writes failing test first — unprompted.

11:47 Catches own stale-closure bug, laughs, fixes it.

19:03 Explains trade-offs out loud. Panel nods.

Integrity PASS — hire with confidence.

Same candidate · two stories · only one is evidence

the record

WHAT YOU ARE LEFT WITH,
PER CANDIDATE.

A hiring decision is easy to make and hard to defend three months later. Every attempt closes into one record your team can reopen — and hand to the person who asks why.

01The attemptEvery keystroke, run and submission on a timeline you can scrub — not a final diff with no history behind it.
02The resultHidden tests executed on our servers in the candidate's language, with the pass/fail matrix that produced the score.
03The signalsTab switches, clipboard events and timing anomalies, disclosed to the candidate and presented for a human to read.
04The judgementRubric scores per dimension from whoever sat in, side by side, so a panel disagreement is visible instead of averaged away.

The candidate keeps the work. You keep the reasoning.

Records stay in the workspace under its retention policy, are written to an append-only audit log, and travel to Greenhouse, Lever or Ashby with the verdict attached.

built for trust

CANDIDATES' WORK,
HANDLED SERIOUSLY.

Hiring data is sensitive. None of these are roadmap promises — each one names a mechanism that is running today.

01

Network-isolated execution

Candidate code never runs on the app server — it executes in a network-disabled sandbox with CPU, memory, and output limits.

02

Server-side grading

Hidden tests run on our infrastructure, not in the candidate's browser. Submitted scores can't be forged client-side.

03

Session replay & integrity signals

Attempt timelines and integrity signals are captured per attempt (with the candidate's knowledge) and surfaced on the scorecard.

04

Two-factor authentication

TOTP-based 2FA with single-use backup codes protects recruiter and admin accounts.

05

Secrets encrypted at rest

ATS keys and integration tokens are AES-256-GCM encrypted and never returned to the browser after saving.

06

Audit trails

Workspace actions, security events, and AI tool calls are written to append-only audit logs.

08Pricing

Per-seat plans. Per-screening credits.

Seats cover the workspace and everyone in it. AI screenings are credits on top, charged only when a candidate actually starts.

Full pricing
Free
$0/ seat / month

Try real interviews with a small team.

  • Live interview rooms
  • Manual scorecards
  • Community challenges
Compare plans
Starter
$19/ seat / month

For teams running regular screens.

  • Take-home assignments
  • Session replay
  • ATS webhooks
Compare plans
GrowthRecommended
$49/ seat / month

Scale screening with AI + automation.

  • AI screening credits
  • Custom challenge authoring
  • External MCP tools
Compare plans